Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Conolog Cp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: StockDung who wrote (67)	3/18/2000 12:03:00 PM
From: Mike E.	Respond to of 428

IT'S MY PARTY Ya know, "Floydie", posts like that really don't help your case. You would have gone a whole lot further had you remained semi-professional and just let the doubts linger. This type of post, however, may very well have the opposite effect you intended on SI. Most here see through it quicker than, say, the free sites. You should've picked an easier target than CNLG.

To: StockDung who wrote (67)	3/18/2000 10:58:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 428

Truthseeker--Getting carried away a bit here, are we? Message 13232590 Guess what? You got ta FIGHT for the RIGHT to PARRR-TEEEEE!!!! Back on track, it seems to me you got three beefs with Conolog: 1) Their PR firm is the same one who handled ZSUN where you clearly lost. So I'll simply make a presumption you don't like losing and that you've picked a fight with some of the leftover elements of a prior battle, i.e., ZSUN's PR firm, which also is Conolog's PR firm. 2) You don't like Warren Schriebner. Well, who the hell is William Loeb, er, I mean Warren Schriebner? Seems to me you shorties should have done your dirty work while Schriebner was selling most of his shares. Ironically, you would have been allied. Regardless of what he's ever done with his past associations, Schriebner's not an officer of Conolog. He put some money up and took it back from selling his shares. His profits in the deal are probably still riding with Conolog. Have you checked out that possibility yet? I mean isn't that what investors do? It's moot, however. Anywhere else you wanna go with the Schriebner issue is just extra duty on your part. In the overall view of Conolog, you've spent an inordinate amount of time researching what essentially amounts to a two-bit player in the larger picture. The players who really count in this are the executive management of the company, the extent and quality of clientele and revenue the company is earning. Most of us who bought did that kind of research. 3) And then you have a beef with the fact the company took a tax write-off due it in order to report profitable results. Whoopie-doopie-do! The IRS welcomes us all in April! So what are your plans? Think you might find a write-off somewhere in order to get a positive return? Probably. Most people and companies do. Call off your short. You may get some mileage due to the low float probabilities, but your short followers also could get screwed in the process, because of the very low float. Which leads me to a question: How many shares are out there your shorting infestation can sink their teeth into? Think you folks are gonna have a tough time finding shares to short? And what happens if only a few of you get in? Here's a good one. What happens if the XYBR folks decide to pay you back by massively buying into CNLG? Your primary opponent on the XYBR thread, rrufff, actually has made this recommendation. I followed up on it and offered such an invitation. As I wrote before, I like a fair up and a fair down. Your truthseeking methods somehow don't fit this criteria. And, by the way. I've been known to throw some great parties. Tremendous parties! Parties where you'll find people of every kind. Maybe even a shorter or two. But they don't ever short the party or play such silly tunes as you suggested in to the post to which I'm responding. You wanna throw the party and I'll seek the truth? OK. Then call off your Conolog short. Shorter beware!