Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Conolog Cp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KevinMark who wrote (99)	3/18/2000 8:08:00 PM
From: ChrisJP	Respond to of 428

Anyone who's mystified by all the attention being given to this little company, check out the XYBR thread (also on the hot list tonight). Can't believe that anyone would think little CNLG is in the same league as XYBR. Message 13232725 Thanks for the entertainment one and all. And if there's volatility next week -- PLAY THE WARRANTS (CNLGW) !!!!!!!! Chris Wow ! And I got a great post grub too ! Number 100 !

To: KevinMark who wrote (99)	3/18/2000 8:24:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 428

Re: Your post to Truthseeker. >>>Based on the information that your providing, your giving off buy signals, now that Schreiber has swindled his small fortune out of the company, and his shares are in the holders of other investors. If what you say is true, then so be it, only time will tell.<<< Excellent point, Kevin! It's also prudent to ask: Why would the Bonneville Power Association, General Electric and Boston Edison be doing business with Conolog? Regarding the criticisms of the public relations firm, if they were truly involved in a pump and dump scheme, wouldn't they be milking the fiberoptics issue? The clear fact is the company hasn't done this. As I recall, of Conolog's many, many press releases--most of which lead to additional revenue for the company--I think the fiberoptics issue has only been promoted twice. In the press releases, Conolog is described mostly as a company involved with DSP. I think it all goes back to a vendetta resulting from Truthseeker's disgruntlement and bitterness from his battles with the PR firm relative to ZSUN, where Truthseeker ended up with a lot of egg on his face due to the court order. I sort of like the idea the XYBR poster had for XYBR investors to buy into Conolog in order to beat this short scam back.

To: KevinMark who wrote (99)	3/18/2000 10:04:00 PM
From: Jack Hartmann	Respond to of 428

Kevin, you're right on the financials. Stock had moved from $1 to 2 on PRs on the January 31 week. I didn't see the usual hype prior to the movement. Yahoo posters were hoping for $3 in a few months. I can't find any pumping other than www.lion.com on 2/3/00 mentioning CNLG as an afterhours play. On 2/4/00, the stock jumped from $2 to $6 intraday. That movement alone attracted attention from momentum players and daytraders. $29M marketcap and 5M float makes this subject to wild swings. Reminds me of the January runup of AQIS and February's runup of MCLL. I see Schreiber's selling more of profitaking, but his past is worth watching to see if other insiders start selling too. This could easily go back to $7.50, but I don't see it going to $3 any time soon unless some bad news comes out. If I bought at $2, I'd take my principle out and let the rest ride. I don't chase stocks nor participate in shorting so I'll watch from the side. Jack