SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sand wedge who wrote (20638)3/18/2000 9:35:00 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
re. ORCL and MSFT

I have some ORCL and have enjoyed its recent appreciation. I'm not yet totally convinced the arrogance exhibited by the "Black Prince" after the last earnings report was justified. As for Softie, they have an obvious reason to "low profile" other ventures right now. It's possible to interpret "wee Willy's" recent change in position as an indication of a future emphasis on "new directions".

lurking...

lurqer



To: sand wedge who wrote (20638)3/18/2000 10:08:00 PM
From: saukriver  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 54805
 
ORCL: Revenue Anemia?

I thought the Oracle revenue numbers that Shamsaee posted on Wednesday suggested that Oracle's revenues were flat. Are those revenues indicative of a company "leveraging" into "other tornadoes?"

See Message 13206747



To: sand wedge who wrote (20638)3/18/2000 11:55:00 PM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
I couldn't of said it better. Thanks, many people don't see it yet, and I like that they don't. <g> Even ML B2B basket didn't have ORCL in it. Back when the B2B craze was starting I was saying that in the long run ORCL would more stable and be the one to own. Look at the charts of CMRC, ARBA, VERT compare them to ORCL.

Greg