To: Phil(bullrider) who wrote (123 ) 3/18/2000 10:33:00 PM From: lawdog Respond to of 415
Dear Idiotic Asshole, takes one to know oneBullhorn also makes a very creative use of the word intelligible which typically is only used to critique a speaker. Is it all that "consulting" that makes him so imaginative?I have never claimed to be anything other than an average investor. I wasn't criticizing your specific inadequacies as an investor. I was making a generalized observation of your apparent lack of ability at anything.You have stated that you were a Stanford graduate, yet when reviewing your posts the other day, I found a multitude of misspelled words. There wasn't a spelling section to the LSAT or law school exams. In fact, none of my profs gave a crap. They were more concerned with the ability to form arguments and with your knowledge of law. Both of which I, apparently, excelled at.Now you are going to belittle me for using a dictionary to refresh my memory on words that I haven't seen or used in a good period of time? You never knew those words, nor any other word with more than 3 syllables. They aren't words I, or anyone else, use everyday. Yet, when the best word is available for a particular situation, I have full use of normal vocabulary for an educated person.I believe you to be one that is using the dictionary to pick seldom used words in an effort to confuse your opponent in an argument. See above. "Confusing an opponent through English". hahhahhahahhahhaha. That's so stupid it's funny.Keep posting, Until I get tired of toying with you.And, Have fun, Phil I am. You too. intelligible is defined as: 1: Comprehensible 2:Capable of being apprehended by the intellect alone. I still believe the words you have used were unintelligible. Intelligible is most properly used with spoken language. The more appropriate word is "diction". And "unobserving" is still not in any dictionary I have perused. Get a new dictionary. Peace and love. lawdog.