SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IRID - Iridium World Communications IPO Announced! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Citidude who wrote (2595)3/19/2000 1:48:00 AM
From: ML  Respond to of 2693
 
<I cannot understand why perfectly good satellites have to be destroyed.>

Its pretty simple. The Iridium satellite constellation is far too expensive to maintain and operate.



To: Citidude who wrote (2595)3/19/2000 12:53:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 2693
 
I agree with you that it is a shame that the satellites will be destroyed. I also agree that Iridium's concept was remarkable. Most of the people who have posted an opinion on Iridium on SI lately are long Globalstar, whose stock price isn't "behaving well" and hope that the destruction of Iridium will help their investments, so they aren't exactly unbiased. Here is a link to what is probably the most useful site on the Internet about satellites, the guy is an engineer, doesn't invest in stocks, and has no financial bias:

ee.surrey.ac.uk

However, my guesstimate, based on documents filed in the bankruptcy proceeding, is that the cost of operating the constellation is probably in the range of $4 million a month. That's just based on what the judge approved - since Motorola is operating the constellation, which it built, and is "lending" the money to Iridium, the only party that knows what it really costs is Motorola, - someone posted earlier that they offered to operate it for McCaw for $8 million a month, and there is obviously some profit built into that price.

I am surprised that the satellites won't be auctioned - but there is still time, as the decommissioning will take months. If the creditors protest the destruction, maybe there will be an auction, who knows?



To: Citidude who wrote (2595)3/20/2000 8:13:00 AM
From: CMon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2693
 
<<I cannot understand why perfectly good satellites have to be destroyed.>>

The present value of running the system is negative.
Easy enough?