SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Keep Your Eye On The Ball - Watch List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Susan Saline who wrote (1718)3/30/2000 10:02:00 AM
From: TFF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2802
 
P/S Ratios and the 24 Riskiest Stocks
[BRIEFING.COM - Robert V. Green] In yesterday's Stock Brief, we discussed how the price/sales ratio has become an important indicator in today's marketplace. It is best viewed as a measure of the latent risk in your stock. Every investor should know the price/sales ratio of their stocks, particularly those holding the 24 riskiest stocks in the market, as defined by their Price/Sales ratios.

Price/Sales Defined
The price/sales ratio is:

Market Capitalization / Trailing Twelve Month Sales

The ratio can also be viewed as stock price divided by the sales/share, but sales/share is not a reported figure. It is clearer to view the ratio as total market cap divided by the trailing revenues.

Yesterday's Misunderstanding
Yesterday's Stock Brief repeatedly stated that a high price/sales ratio implied a high expectation of revenue growth.

Apparently, some readers inferred from that statement that the message was "the higher the Price/Sales ratio, the better," since high revenue growth is a good thing.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

In fact, because a high price/sales ratio implies a high revenue growth curve, any failure to live up to that expectation is severely punished by a drop in valuation.

Anyone investing in a stock with a high price/sales ratio needs to understand that the rate of revenue growth is more important than revenue growth. An unexpected slowdown in the rate of growth will cause a sharp drop in the stock, even if the actual growth is positive.

The 24 Most Risky Stocks In The Market
The higher the price/sales ratio, the higher the implied rate of growth.

The following 24 companies have the highest price/sales ratio in the market, for stocks with higher than $35 million in revenue. (There are many stocks with high price/sales ratios with very little sales; they are in a different category of speculative stocks.)

Any of these companies which fall short of their current or expected rate of revenue growth, risk a sharp mark down in the price/sales ratios, which would result in a sharp drop in the price of the stock, even if the absolute revenue growth is positive.

Stocks with an NA in the 3 year revenue growth column are even riskier, because their revenue history has less data points, meaning greater uncertainty in the projected revenue curve.

Company Symbol Price/Sales TTM Revenue (MM) Market Cap (MM) 1 Year Rev. Growth Rate % 3 Year Revenue Growth Rate %
Infospace INSP 435 36.5 16,067 286 NA
Juniper Networks JNPR 290 102.6 47,695 2,595 NA
Ariba ARBA 270 62.0 24,244 321 NA
Metromedia Fiber Network MFNX 268 75.3 27,309 106 583
Verisign VRSN 235 84.8 19,456 118 297
Inktomi INKT 218 96.6 22,287 234 412
Rambus RMBS 181 44.8 7,666 14.6 56
Next Level Comm. NXTV 179 57.6 11,279 31 NA
Yahoo! YHOO 175 588.6 102,663 154 424
Redback Networks RBAK 159 64.3 12,780 598 NA
Brocade Comm BRCD 148 103.4 18,217 323 NA
Software.com SWCM 145 44.6 6,163 62 76
Tibco Software TIBX 143 120.3 20,445 105 47
BroadVision BVSN 140 115.5 15,118 126 355
eBay EBAY 132 224.7 28,947 200 NA
Digex DIGX 132 59.8 10,696 164 177
Foundry Networks FDRY 127 133.5 17,340 683 NA
PMC-Sierra PMCS 124 262.5 30,043 62 12
Applied MicroCircuits AMCC 120 144.9 16,877 48 28
Vignette VIGN 113 89.2 12,843 450 NA
Exodus EXDS 112 241.6 27,655 358 234
Globespan GSPN 112 56.2 7,176 79 NA
Gemstar Intl. GMST 105 206.2 18,302 33 44
Research In Motion RIMM 105 77.7 8,128 104 NA

Source: Marketguide. Data as of close 3/28/00.

Sycamore Networks (SCMR) deserves an honorable mention, with an estimated price/sales ratio of around 350; however, with only three quarters of reported revenue, a true comparable price/sales ratio cannot be made.

Earnings Reports
If you own any of these stocks, you should realize that the revenue numbers will be more important than actual earnings numbers, when earnings season starts next month.

This becomes especially tricky, because while all of these companies have projected earnings numbers, projected revenue numbers for Q1 from sell-side analysts are not widely publicized.

But revenue will be the first number that money managers look at when the reports come in April, with earnings and margin trends next. A sharp increase in operating margins won't help these stocks if the revenue projections fall far short of expectations.

Comments may be emailed to the author, Robert V. Green, at rvgreen@briefing.com



To: Susan Saline who wrote (1718)4/22/2000 9:55:00 AM
From: TFF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2802
 
Fire Sale Prices May Burn Some 'Dot-Com' Stocks

By WALTER HAMILTON, Times Staff Writer

The stock market's brutal sell-off in the last month has saddled some battered "dot-com" companies with an ironic new problem: On top of their many other worries, the fact that their stocks have sunk to such low levels may itself keep the share prices from rebounding.
A large number of Internet shares have tumbled to "penny-stock" status of $5 or less--a level at which institutions such as mutual funds won't even consider buying them. And without the backing of mutual funds and pension funds, whose enormous sums generally provide a stock's greatest fuel, the shares face one more obstacle to recapturing their former glory.
Of the 318 dot-com stocks that have gone public since the beginning of 1998, 55, or more than 17%, trade for $5 or less, according to Thomson Financial/Securities Data. And 16% trade for between $5 and $10.
The ranks of dot-com penny stocks now include such well-known names as Drkoop.com and Theglobe.com, which made news in late 1998 with a spectacular first-day trading gain.
"Definitely, the price does have an impact on whether institutional investors will buy the stock," said John Faig, Internet analyst at the American Express mutual fund group. "A stock that's under $20 is a cause for concern. [If it's] under $10 it's in the stock graveyard."
Statistics show that institutions have been heavy sellers of dot-com firms in the last year, with individuals hopping aboard in their place. To some experts, "dumb money" is buying as "smart money" is fleeing.
Institutions make up 70% to 75% of the typical shareholder base when companies first sell stock in initial public offerings, said Chris Taylor, a director at Citigate Dewe Rogerson, a New York-based financial communications firm. But at year-end, data show that institutions held no more than 20% to 30% of many smaller dot-coms. And, experts say, institutional ownership is likely to have dropped further this year as tech stocks have plummeted.
"Since the time of the IPOs, institutions appear to have been significant net sellers of this group of companies, and individual investors now own the majority" of the shares, Taylor said.
A year ago, Internet companies--particularly e-commerce plays--were the toast of the stock market as investors giddily disregarded their lack of earnings.
But sentiment has shifted so dramatically that many investors now doubt whether most companies can turn a profit--or even stay in business. Indeed, auditors for well-known Web companies such as Drkoop.com and Value America warned recently that the companies' survival is in "substantial doubt."
For some companies that already had been locked in a downward spiral, the recent technology sector sell-off has officially pushed them into penny-stock terrain.
For example, Cyberian Outpost, BiznessOnline.com and 1-800-Flowers.com all have slipped to less than $5 in the last week or so. The market's partial rebound early this week helped EToys and several others pop back above that level.
At such depressed levels, it could be very difficult for the companies to raise capital via new stock sales.
Of course, some firms appear to have enough cash to keep going for the foreseeable future. Theglobe.com, which completed a secondary offering in May 1999 following its November 1998 IPO, lists almost $56 million in cash and short-term securities. Fashionmall.com reports almost $42 million.
Still, having a low-priced stock can become self-perpetuating. Though few institutions have explicit prohibitions against buying penny stocks, many say they simply don't bother to look at them.
A share price under $10--a "single-digit midget," in the words of newsletter writer Fred Hickey--is a big red flag to institutions because it shows the low regard with which Wall Street views the stock.
"Good fundamental companies with strong and well-run businesses rarely sell for $10 a share, much less $5 a share," said Bill Koehler, head of investment oversight at American Century mutual funds. "We spend so little time focusing on things like penny stocks that it's not even in our lexicon."
Many institutional investors have taken a path on dot-coms similar to Fritz Reynolds'. The head of the San Francisco-based Reynolds fund group bought 2,000 shares of Theglobe.com early last year, figuring that if the company blossomed into a big player he would have a toehold. He often uses that strategy, and it has paid off with stocks such as Microsoft.
But Reynolds dumped the shares later in the year after the stock foundered. "Along the way, you find ones that you don't want to own, and Theglobe.com fits in that category," he said.
Jennifer Zwiebel, a spokeswoman for Theglobe.com, said the company expects the stock will rebound if it is able to become profitable in the next two years. "I don't think there's any concern" about the falling stock price, she said. "It's about building the business and proving it."
Making matters worse for dot-coms, some brokerages don't recommend penny stocks to clients.
Edward Jones in St. Louis, for example, bars brokers from recommending stocks priced at less than $4 and won't pay brokers commissions on the sales even if they are done at a customer's request, said Alan Skrainka, the firm's chief market strategist.
Mutual funds also are hesitant to buy penny stocks because their market values are so small that they don't have a significant effect on a large portfolio, said Bob Grandhi, chief investment officer at the Monument fund group.


* * *

'Dot-Coms' for Pennies
Shares of many once-promising Internet firms now trade for less than $5 a share, while others are at risk of falling below that threshold.
Already Below $5

Ticker 52-week Thurs. Pctg. Instit.
Company symbol high close decline ownership*
Drkoop.com KOOP $45.75 $2.50 -95% 22%
Value America VUSA 43.25 2.00 -95 34
E-Loan EELN 74.38 4.44 -94 30
Theglobe.com TGLO 34.94 3.56 -90 23
PlanetRx.com PLRX 36.50 3.56 -90 21
Fashionmall.com FASH 15.88 2.66 -83 11
1-800-Flowers.com FLWS 23.19 4.50 -81 46
Salon.com SALN 15.13 3.00 -80 23

Headed for Penny Stock Status?

Ticker 52-week Thurs. Pctg. Instit.
Company symbol high close decline ownership*
EToys ETYS 86.00 6.00 -93 27
TheStreet.com TSCM 71.25 7.06 -90 50
Webvan Group WBVN 34.00 5.75 -83 19
Barnesandnoble.com BNBN 26.63 8.56 -68 29

* Institutional ownership as a percentage of "float," the number of shares in public domain that are available to be traded; as of December 1999
Sources: Thomson Financial/Securities Data, Bloomberg News, Market Guide, Vickers, Citigate Dewe Rogerson



To: Susan Saline who wrote (1718)5/16/2000 11:41:00 AM
From: TFF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2802
 
bottom? naz breaks downtrend on lycos takover rumors(aka nets undervalued)