Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Druss who wrote (53423)	3/19/2000 8:18:00 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Druss - quite frankly XYBR is a speculative investment in which I've been in since it was about a buck. It certainly is not for the feint of heart. It has many extreme fans and many extreme detractors. You can check out the pros and cons, if you are sincere, at the XYBR thread. As with anything, if it succeeds, it will go much much higher from the current (approx 14) level. The reason for all the hoopla is that Truthseeker came to the XYBR thread, in typical form, about an hour before closing, basically re-hashing the boilerplate auditor's warning (which can be found in many of the long picks on this very thread). I feel it was mis-represented by Auric as such that the next step WOULD be bankruptcy. He actually stated that the next step was bankruptcy. With the deadlines for publication on Friday, Bloomberg picked this up as news even though the warning was in the SEC filings for the past 4 years. I'm basically against scams long and short. That's about it. No sense re-hashing it. I realize Truthseeker and Auric are regulars here and I have no desire to keep going on and on. It's a small part of my portfolio. However, when challenged - particularly when I feel there is an unfair tactic being used, the bashers will find out that they have gone against the wrong person.