To: Brian P. who wrote (15810 ) 3/20/2000 2:07:00 AM From: miraje Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
SUV's have not had to meet the pollution control requirements of cars since they, by deliberate special exemption of Congress, have been classified as "trucks" (what a joke--whole lotta heavy duty work bein' done by those macho Joe Schmoe suburbans and their soccer moms). They pollute much more. You missed my whole point. If the government hadn't killed off large cars, there wouldn't be so many SUVs. There was a dual regulatory standard between cars and trucks, both in emissions and CAFE, which helped to foster the SUV craze. Even with that, newer SUVs ARE clean running, even though they get lousy MPG. And who gives you, or anyone, the right to tell Joe Schmoe or soccer moms what they can or cannot drive? If they wish to pay $50 or $60 to fill up the tanks on their tanks, that's their business, not yours.They pollute much more. Sorry, but they don't.Why does Joe Schmoe Suburban, stoked up on imbecilic, juvenile SUV commercials, need a friggin truck to tool around town and feel macho in? Just because people want their play toys? And just who the hell are you to tell people what they can and cannot drive?They want to drive their big gas-guzzling polluting play toys, cry like babies when the price of oil goes up, are oblivious to the fact that we create the lion's share of the world's pollution, and lecture the Chinese and the rest of the world about cutting greenhouse emissions. What a crock! I've traveled extensively, including 3rd world countries and Eastern Europe, and can attest for a fact that our evil capitalist gas guzzling SUV infested cities are a hell of a lot cleaner than their counterparts overseas. You and your buddy Al Gore would love to kill off the automobile and what it stands for, mobility, freedom, the antithesis of statist controls. Dream on, because it ain't gonna happen.