Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cube who wrote (53431)	3/20/2000 1:02:00 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Cube, Finally a post of substance without the bashing lingo. OK - I've never mentioned Anthony by name and am only here by involuntary "invitation" when the bashers arrive and basically I respond. Usually, the facts are partial ones. You know that's a favorite ploy. My comments about lemmings weren't necessarily about his lemmings lol. There is a lot that I like that goes on this thread. However, the bullying tactics are what gets me going. I'm not going to take it when it's one of the ones in which I believe. I've got the resources and time to back up what I say. XYBR is a small part of my portfolio. The financials are what they are and really no different from a lot of companies that are recommended even on this thread. I'm not bashing them but when QTEK finally files an audited statement, the number of shares from its recent resuscitation may be interesting. Again, not bashing, in fact I may take a position. However, my point is that it would be really easy to give a Half Truthseeker piece on QTEK. I could prepare one in about an hour. What I'm saying is that, I'm sure you'll agree, you can look at these things both ways. QTEK has potential, XYBR has potential. They trade on this and of course momentum. They both have negatives that can strike you right between the eyes if you present it in a distorted way. The bashing and tricksters were out on Friday and were successful in what I feel was an unethical way with partial truths and selective leaks. I disagree with the rest of your post as none of it jibes with the fact that those with significant resources such as SONY, IBM, HP , et al, have partnered in some fashion. I don't think they would remotely allow their name and reputation to be linked to XYBR if it were a scam. My opinion is that it is going up. Period. I am long by the way. lol PS As far as the medical issues, I don't dismiss them. Of course, we probably could talk all night about the issues with cell phones and what a finding of tumor production would do to Erickson, Motorola and QQQualcommm. One man's risk is another's reward. That's what makes this so exciting. I could even bash QQQ, but nah it's the greatest.