SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The O who wrote (17633)3/20/2000 10:14:00 AM
From: tahoe_bound  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28311
 
Breakout now at $92 1/2

First of all, I also want to say thank you very much to those who posted the info. over the weekend. Very nice. Very concise and compelling thoughts added as well, I was impressed.

I kind of expected there to be a lot of euphoria and rah rah, from a sentiment perspective that could be something to be a little cautious of if it gets too extreme for those cold-hearted unbiased types who have been burned all too often before getting all too giddy and emotional lol, as I said before what matters for the stock price is the collective market opinion as a whole, not just what the most ardent admirers think unfortunately! Hopefully, some of that enthusiasm will spill over some and not just be a temporary flash in the pan. In the market there are no guarantees, GNET has been known to turn on a dime, but it does look good right now I will say. Have a good week!

Here are the Sunday Securitytrader comments:

"One word, EXPLOSIVE on breakout... and very close to doing so... 92 1/2 is b/o... FEED before breakout!!!!!"

The accompanying chart shows a nice weekly candlestick put in with a long "tail" or "wick" bouncing up from the 200 day moving average, this is (usually) bullish according to ST. The blue lines drawn in are a small descending triangle pattern, a breakout of the top line slanting down from the Dec. and Jan. high is 92 1/2. That is where they derive this number from. (To me this b/o line looks a little bit lower than what they have shown, in any case, ideally IF this does bust out, high volume is important)