Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (20812)	3/20/2000 1:17:00 PM
From: chaz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

GREG: Look at posts #20347 and #20816. That's what we're all about. If you'll talk to us in the way these people did, you could make a REAL contribution here. Don't be such a hard ass about it. Chaz

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (20812)	3/20/2000 1:30:00 PM
From: Apollo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

gorillas come back with a vengeance.... But I would also emphasize that accumulating an established Gorilla (such as MSFT or INTC) is usually a good investment strategy. Once they come back into favor they usually do with a vengeance. INTEL; 1998-1999 were rough; 2000's looking a lot better. siliconinvestor.com Stan

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (20812)	3/20/2000 2:24:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 54805

>> I had read recently that investors who pay attention to sector rotation (and modify their portfolios accordingly) do much better than LTBH. Could you cite a source or provide a link to that article, Betty. I'd be very interested in their methodology and measurement criteria. Their proposition is in complete disagreement with everything I've read, observed, experienced, and believe about ltb&h versus trading. Some folks claim to be able to time the market, but their results never hold up to objective scrutiny over the long term. uf