SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lucretius who wrote (19002)3/20/2000 1:07:00 PM
From: Zach E.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42523
 
I think you might be right about INTC really holding up the market at this point.. Seems a little early to call the DELL chart a double top. I just looked at the profile, is DELL really a $150 Billion stock? UFB.

Zach



To: Lucretius who wrote (19002)3/20/2000 1:10:00 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42523
 
checked the POS lately ?...

ho ho ho ho ... waaaaahh waaaah!! <g>



To: Lucretius who wrote (19002)3/20/2000 2:13:00 PM
From: Greg Jung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42523
 
For our amusement from jj "whipsaw" Cramer:



I agreed that CAL would be down while our tech stuff would fire right back up. I agreed to cut the position in half.
I acknowledged that the stock would be down a buck and a half and we would be down 100 Gs by midday. I
acknowledged I had hurt us because I had strayed from the narrow and true path of growth.

And that's exactly what happened. CAL opened down, stayed down, and finished at the low of the day. I was
shamed. And angered. I had bought into the rap of my critics that I had to buy cheap and sell dear and that little
lesson cost 100 Gs in less than 24 hours. I apologized and promised I wouldn't do it again.


PS: CAL up 1 1/2, back to his buy point, today.
MSTR -137

Why the hell he can bitch and moan about a few points lost
in CAL with his "red hots" theme.