To: jmhollen who wrote (6057 ) 3/20/2000 5:38:00 PM From: jmhollen Respond to of 7209
To: Jorj X. McKie who wrote (157) From: jmhollen Monday, Mar 20, 2000 5:31 PM ET Reply # of 158 Hi Jorj, Actually no, I did the majority of my investigation in to the potential of LGOV over a period of two years - beginning three years ago. And once satisfied that it was a correctly directed effort - at the right time (..discounting a nuclear confrontation or Clintwit fondling the PRC Chairman's wife..) I collected a majority of my shares during the $0.14 era; and continue accumulating at convenient junctures. I will again suggest that you have an extensive conversation with Dan Mendez at (949)252-2180, as he may have some references for your research outside of website postings or already hashed-over Edgar data. I'm glad someone likes that mush; I guess that's why God invented accountants and thick lenses. Having done a lot of R&D in my work, I'm well aware that there is very little income possibility until you can package your "widget" and hang it on the peg at WalMart. The perceptual division between vision and p&l statements is apparently what intrigues some and infuriates others, aye. As LGOV is now beginning to hang their widgets on the pegs, and has 13+ invitations (licenses) to continue to do so in China, not to mention the PacRim, seems like the next several financial reports may be more like what you enjoy dissecting. OBTW: let me invite you over to the main LGOV thread; [*] to continue this discussion with the majority of the participants. I won't be returning here except to include related news articles..... I've taken the liberty of pasting these posts over there as a start. See you there. Have a nice day. John :-)