Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (50653)	3/21/2000 5:58:00 PM
From: TATRADER	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116798

Whereever I go, just mention the name on Silicon, Zeev, and he responds...This break today was what I was waiting for... I am looking for XAU tomorrow of 62.50-63.50...Should consolidate in this area, before we move to target 67.50-68.00...Doubled positions in BMG,PDG...AEM looking good at 6 3/16...NEM could make a run at 30.00... MACD zero line crossover, Directional indicator crossover, break from double bottom formation,Volume acceleration, closes near highs of day..Momentum should continue at least for 1 more day... Reports have it that Goldman Sachs is offering Richard Mazzarelli a six figure position as technical analyst for their precious metals department...Please keep this information to yourself and do not leak it out to anyone...(vbg)Several TA people there apparently lost their positions today after their brilliant downgrade of several gold stocks... I know you will tell me, "Mark, please calm down, this is just the bump I was telling you about! Prepare to be disappointed again!" your friend, Mr.XXXX

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (50653)	7/27/2000 10:36:17 PM
From: d:oug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116798

Zeev, Question: Is the trend still your friend? Helpful Hint/Warning: For those captured in this dougak babble post and wish to both escape and continue, then scroll down until you see the following. (Thats the end/conclusion of this post.) ================ Doug, GET a LIFE ================ Playing markets for fun, profit or lost, i do not do. Once i SI'ed BookMarked you, but it was no fun and games, too serious and technical. Even the joking around & kidding was done using a scientific method. No resulting entertainment. Like watching folks work. Hopefully you enjoy your craft, as you do it well based on the number of other people watching and following you. But now a wondering from i about that place called the Nasquack or Nasdaq or Nasduck. Not about companies or money, but its trend of one year ago to today. First a social phenomenon called "Progress by and for the Human Race." Talking more about basic living conditions, those things each generation developes through hard work and finally accomplishes and passes them on to the next generation that can not believe that they did not exist in your time, like indoor plumbing. Not talking about bread here, as one can live in the middle of a location that contains the greatest and most advanced modern wonders of mankind, but one cannot buy a good loaf of bread, while one living in a remote village in France, that just installed indoor plumbing, always had bread wine and fresh vegtables to represent correct rather than progress. I now invoke any Gypsy dna i may have that was added to my Polish tree branches and see if i can flimflam you into a purchase of a bottle of Doctor Good. 199 proof at 60 degrees F. inert volume - 1/2 of 1% ron reeces peanut flubbers cut paste pieces Now, year 1 technology = 1 year 2 technology = 2 year 3 technology = 3 But what is noticed by society, as in change. First, lets not try to understand what i mean by a technology increment of 1, as i do not know, except to describe it as a slow steady increase in the standard of life living, like indoor plumbing, and not like a new unlimited energy source. Eventhought each year has the same amount of technology increment, it may be ok to assume that each step has a standard of life increase greater than the prior. To use a stinky example, as it understood easily. From a behind the bushes to an outhouse to indoor toilet, the change is of an equal technology step, but the second one is a much nicer one that the first one. Please agree as i do not want to get into details. thanks So for each 1 year increment there is a 1 technology increment. Plotted on a child's graph paper X-Y, its a straight line. Now plot each years increment with the "felt better" human result. As i mentioned above, its more than an addition of the same amount. Doug, GET a LIFE ================ This post is going on too long, so i jump to the end part. Follows is the Nasdaq plotted for one year past, on Yahoo. Its value is on Y axis using a logarithmic grid, and if one takes a ruler and places the top edge of each end, the inbetween chart aligns with the ruler as a straight line except that the hump which looks like a car tire used long ago that had inner tubes and when there was a hole or other non normal tire surface, that bubble would poke out, meaning not good, fix me, put me back inside so i look like before. So ignoring that bubble, extend a straight line and it seems that if this trend is what should be, then the curent value of the Nasdaq is where it should be, and no further drop will occur if economy remains steady. Using a grid like those squares, and its a roller coaster trip. quote.yahoo.com^IXIC&d=1y So Zeev, is this a valid trend that says the Nasdaq today is at a correct place, and with no bomb shells, the Nasdaq will not go lower, and will only go higher at a slow and steady pace with no big moves up or down if economy steady? doug