Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (101304)	3/22/2000 2:30:00 PM
From: Dom B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

WRONG! and NOT FAIR!!! Ibexx sez sold RMBS in the 400's, could be 450 per... A long time ago, Ibexx asked me if i have RMBS, and I said, no, i could not handle Rambo's volatility. But I did buy a little later, and I still have those tiny 25 shares @ 70ish. And I haven't added any. GRRRRRRRRR! For all we know, Ibexx still has a lot of RMBS, with the 4:1 split approaching... Did you short QQQ @105? hehehe...

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (101304)	3/22/2000 2:34:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Jim, re: Rambus <Maybe you should be rubbing it in to Ibexx, she dumped at 300.> She made her money, and I'm sure she has no regrets, especially since RMBS is such a roller-coaster. Contrast this with INTC, which has been on a slow but steady climb from your favorite price point of 76. ;-) <Tench...tommorrow is another day...maybe you should take the money and run.> Perhaps. But the initial drop from the 400's wasn't due to anything significant. Even the press was grasping at straws when they attributed the drop to Tom's Hardware Guide! Since when did Herr Uberclockermeister become a pseudo-analyst? Anyway, I'm sure we'll get back to 400 pretty soon. Tenchusatsu