Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bryston who wrote (11100)	3/22/2000 3:59:00 PM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29986

bryston: Of course Ericsson is a full, card carrying member and respected founder of GSM (God knows why Ericsson could be "respected" by any sentient being), but image and reality are often different, and objective evidence of Ericsson's technological prowess (if any) is scanty. And Ericsson has paid for many a "lunch"+ for European bureaucrats and politicians (and other "decision makers" around the world). But there is clear evidence that Ericsson has given priority to ACES phones rather than G* phones. ACES phones have been rolled out already and are "sweet" by report. This is in sharp contrast to the (almost nonexistent) GSM G* phones. The question is why? Is Ericsson playing games, chosing sides (against G), or worse? Having watched Ericsson during the "Holy Wars", worse seems a reasonable assumption, i.e. Ericsson was out to delay at a minimum, and perhaps destroy at a maximum, G. We will never know of course. But the evidence leads to suspicion. Best. Chaz