Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (24558)	3/23/2000 12:52:00 PM
From: Grashopper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

FUNNY COINCIDENCE I SAID TO THE wife last nite even zeevela was fooled by the earlier run someweeks back and he bought in the low 60s LIKE ME but he was smart enuf to bail out swiftly when the mkt proved him wrong wherein i was asleep at the trigger and became a accidental long.....on the otherhand i told the wife that even under your theory i thought you pulled the trigger too soon yesterday at 55 simply becuse it looked like a 55 close whicj meant to me there would be activity around 57 at least near the morning opening so even under your theory wait till this morn to pull the trigger....i am sure we are both right as indicated by the monoply money we have at the end of the day.....in all events your way provides for a better nites sleep and particular since these new pops by cymi over the last 6weeks were extremely temporary in nature.......i remember a cymi pop to 65 during this timeframe and i was going to pull the trigger rite away but i had to go to the john and by the time i returned 65 was gone with the wind and didnt return.....so i have my hand on the trigger this trip up but still from my DD I THINK THIS TIME IS FOR REAL AND 67 TO 70 IS NOT TOO FAR OFF.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (24558)	3/24/2000 3:12:00 PM
From: Grashopper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25960

Well Zeev; it appears that both of our attempts to be logical with this one just dont cut the cake; at least short range.....maybe the explanation is some sort of consipiracy theory such as the 70% of cymer held by institutions should remain at below 60 until the end of the quarter.

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (24558)	3/24/2000 3:12:00 PM
From: Grashopper	Respond to of 25960

Well Zeev; it appears that both of our attempts to be logical with this one just dont cut the cake; at least short range.....maybe the explanation is some sort of consipiracy theory such as the 70% of cymer held by institutions should remain at below 60 until the end of the quarter.