Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (75973)	3/24/2000 8:36:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I will explain this to you, so that I know that one person comprehends it. If I were to get up from my seat in a restaurant and begin a mime show, I would be disruptive. It is idle to say that, since it is visual, and not noisy, people can look away, first, because I will be in the natural line of sight of many people, and it requires convolutions to avoid seeing me, but second, because I am doing something highly unusual, and there is a psychological effect of distraction that is mostly unavoidable unless very concentrated. Now, some people will find the mime show charming, and be entertained, but others will resent the distraction from their date or business, and will seek to have the restaurant quell the performance. It has nothing to do with sexual fixation, or orality, or anything but excessive distraction. In most cases, the establishment would have the right to make me stop or leave, depending upon its judgment of the overall effect on its other customers, and I think that is correct. So it is with indiscreet breast feeding........

To: jlallen who wrote (75973)	3/24/2000 8:46:00 AM
From: lorrie coey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

No, Misogyny = 15.14. Aristotle on Slaves and Women "Aristotle was conventional for his times in regarding slavery as natural on the grounds that some people were by nature bound to be slaves because their souls lacked the rational part that should rule in a human being. Individuals propounding the contrary view were rare, although one fourth century B.C. orator, Alcidamas, asserted that God has set all men free;nature has made no one a slave. Also in tune with his times was Aristotle's conclusion that women were by nature inferior to men. His view of the inferiority of women was based on faulty notions of biology. He wrongly believed, for example, that in procreation the male with his semen actively gave the fetus its form, while the female had only the passive role of providing its matter. [LoL! "Its Matter"...?!!? BUT wait...it gets EVEN better!] His assertion that females were less courageous than males was justified by dubious evidence about animals, such as the report that a male squid would stand by as if to help when its mate was speared, but that a female squid would swim away when the male was impaled. [Good Riddens!] Although his erroneous biology led Aristotle to evaluate females as incomplete males, he believed that human communities could be successful and happy only if they included the contributions of both women and men. Aristotle argued that marriage was meant to provide mutual help and comfort but that, [LoL!], the husband should rule." KEYWORD: "should"...LoL! Aristotle and his boys are ALL Irrelevant! The Goddess of Free Swimmers and Rationale~