Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : OLED Universal Display Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. Patrick Coffey who wrote (143)	3/24/2000 7:12:00 PM
From: Savant	Respond to of 29732

FED Corp has been around a long time, should be worth watching. Best, S.

To: J. Patrick Coffey who wrote (143)	3/24/2000 11:08:00 PM
From: Jdaasoc	Respond to of 29732

JPC: I started a thread under EMA - Emagin in this section. Bought in today. john

To: J. Patrick Coffey who wrote (143)	3/25/2000 12:12:00 PM
From: que seria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29732

J. Pat--re: EMA. Citicorp, Kodak, and IBM are backers so I think you needn't worry about the fly-by-night risk that we all have to be alert to in checking out a new ticker with a tech story. This is a very real company. It is simply a public company continuation of the heretofore privately held Fed Corporation. There are no prior distributed financials because until just now, Fed Corp/eMagin has not been a publicly reporting company. The shell taken over for the reverse merger was a fashion company; it could have made soap for all the name on the shell matters. Sort of a stealth IPO presented with the deed already done, allowing guys like me (who know one of the brokers involved) to get in at the start. Otherwise I might have bought PANL. I'll take further discussion to the EMA thread. I'll look in here and on the LED thread to see any insights as to which OLED developer owns (not merely licenses) intellectual property, or uses a license well enough to design and be able to make products that OEMs care about. In short, it remains to be seen which company will have profitable applications. I am a long way from having any basis for identifying probable future owners of this space.