SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ali Chen who wrote (101485)3/24/2000 1:51:00 PM
From: f.simons  Respond to of 186894
 
>> No one cares what was ANY basis 15 years ago. It is gone, understand?<<

Ali-
I think we all understand the concept that the future is more important than the past in the investing world. The difference is that Amdroids believe there is NOTHING to be learned from the past and Intelabees believe the past is just one tool in making an educated decision about the future.
It is not too hard to figure out why AMD discounts the possibility of learning from the past.

Regards,
Frank



To: Ali Chen who wrote (101485)3/24/2000 1:52:00 PM
From: steve harris  Respond to of 186894
 
Ali,

re:"some more smack"

pretty simple really.

John missed the point pauLie couldn't make.

Make it so,
Mysef



To: Ali Chen who wrote (101485)3/24/2000 2:06:00 PM
From: jackrabbit  Respond to of 186894
 
Re: No one cares what was ANY basis 15 years ago.

Wrong. Try roughly 8 years. In that time I have seen so many Intel thread gadflys like you and Steve come and go while the rest of us made a whole lot of dough. It's a shame really --hope you see the light.



To: Ali Chen who wrote (101485)3/24/2000 2:19:00 PM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 186894
 
Ali,

As long as you are picking arbitrary short term time frames, it appears that INTC is the better investment.

As of a few moments ago, for the day, Intel was down 0.20%; AMD down 2.22%. Does that make Intel investors wise and AMD investors foolish? Is Rambus a better investment than AMD because it has outperformed AMD this year?

As far as risk goes, if we were to go into a serious prolonged recession, it is very possible that AMD would go to zero. Intel, with plenty of cash, could probably weather any storm.

John



To: Ali Chen who wrote (101485)3/24/2000 10:29:00 PM
From: exhon2004  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ali:

re >>And speaking about risks: in case of stock
market disaster, the INTC can potentially drop
to 1/20 while AMD may go no more than 1/4 of
it's current value, to their book values.<<

Did you use your screwdriver to loosen a few screws and pull that comment out of your @ss?

That drivel is below even what I thought your standards were.