Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: baddtiming who wrote (89072)	3/24/2000 1:58:00 PM
From: If only I'd held	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108040

You see any for sale at 12? No.....I really have no target in mind. But I say the stock could trade to 100 and still be cheap. Only 1.9 million shares outstanding for crying out loud. The market cap moves less than 2 million dollars with every point. That's nothing. Look at all the garbage.....Like FNCM, AMTD, AMZN, EBAY that jumps up 100-200-300-400-500 million dollars on every point gained. What the hell are they doing to justify boosts to their market cap like that?? AMTD is running a failing business model.....and they jump up 174 million dollars with every freaking point they gain. That's real money pal....174 million freakin' dollars. Are you paying attention?? What the hell are they doing to justify that? Losing 12 million dollars this qrtr?? I damn near had a heart attack trying to do business with them bafoons. NATS could make 2 times their present market cap on one underwriting. AMTD doesn't even do that shit. One day folks will wake up to the realization that they are rewarding HUGELY........the wrong companies. These are my opinions. You want a stock that could get you a shitload of points in gains....NATS could be it.