Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (38867)	3/24/2000 2:34:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Pomp, I just backed in at $327.125 to see it going lower (of course), after taking a little trip this morning. The severe down swing in the NAZ might be a temporary concern, but with RMBS, should we not have NAZ down RMBS up? Zeev

To: pompsander who wrote (38867)	3/24/2000 2:53:00 PM
From: Jdaasoc	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93625

pomp: I thought the ITC news might cause a little enthusiam today The Hitachi suit action was fine when RMBS was at $70 and everyone was kicking sand in RMBS's face. They proved they were willing to defend their IP. However, I think this latest legal action is counterproductive. I wouldn't doubt that Hitachi could go to court to countersue claiming monopolistic practices. LOL. It wouldn't be the first time something like this has happened. No matter what the merits or possible rewards gained, RMBS's suits the overall effect is going to be negative on RMBS because in the end result will be a bunch of legal bills and not much compensatory damages awarded. Sega could easily settle for monetery amounts that wouldn't even cover ZRMBS's legal bills. As a lawyer, any comments. john