SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TouchStone S/W (TSSW) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Alan Cook who wrote (3206)3/25/2000 9:11:00 AM
From: cmg  Respond to of 3627
 
PartsBase.com Up Despite Commerce One Reports
By KEVIN MAX
NYTimes.com/TheStreet.com
hares of PartsBase.com, a newly public business-to-business company in the aviation industry, rose Friday despite reports that giant Commerce One would create a huge online marketplace for the big aerospace and military-contracting companies.
Commerce One is expected to extend its B2B services to Boeing , Lockheed Martin , Raytheon and British Aerospace much in the same way as it strode into the auto industry and immediately dominated smaller competitors in the fragmented business.

The prospect seemed daunting, but investors seemed unfazed Friday by the implications for other companies that develop online exchanges for specific industries.

Shares of Commerce One rose 18 11/16, or 9.12 percent, to close at 223 11/16, while PartsBase.com gained 1 7/16, or 11.44 percent, to 14, just two days after its unenthusiastic debut on the stock market.

"Our sources say that this deal is very likely to happen," said William Epifanio, an analyst at JP Morgan who rates Commerce One a buy. His firm has not done any underwriting for Commerce One.

None of the companies in the possible deal had returned phone calls for comment by Friday afternoon.

Epifanio said he expected the deal to be announced very soon. "It should be at least the size of the auto exchange," he said, referring to a transaction that put Commerce One and Oracle in charge of the multibillion-dollar online exchange for parts and services for General Motors , Ford Motor and DaimlerChrysler.

In February, the Big Three automakers agreed to form an independent company that will combine their purchasing networks under Oracle and Commerce One.

When investors realized that GM had hired Commerce One to handle its parts exchange, they yanked the rug out from underneath FreeMarkets , a Commerce One rival which had come public less than a month before. Shares tumbled 63 3/8, or 18 percent to 278 1/2 on that news.

GM and Ford spend a combined $166 billion in parts and services annually. One estimate puts the total U.S. aerospace/defense market alone at $187 billion in 2000 and $219 billion by 2004. Within four years, 35 percent, or $77 billion, of those sales is predicted to be conducted exclusively over the Internet.

"But it's not like the auto deal where Oracle and Commerce One had to split the business," Epifanio said. "Right now, it seems that Commerce One is the only player, at least the at the exchange level."

That assessment excludes PartsBase.com, which is a pure Internet player that enables companies to buy and sell new, used and overhauled aviation parts, perform auctions and sell aircraft through its online marketplace. The Boca Raton, Fla.-based company gets virtually all its revenues from the aviation industry. It lists Boeing as a customer.

PartsBase.com asserts on its Web site that it is to be the world's largest online marketplace in aviation, with more than 13,000 members in 115 countries, and a database of 1,200 suppliers.

In its registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company said its direct competitors included AV Support and Inventory Locator Service, a subsidiary of Availl. But it made no mention of Commerce One, which has been moving aggressively into any fragmented industries with a large number of buyers and suppliers.

"I think there's a risk for smaller players," Epifanio said. "The key is volume, volume, volume. It's a situation where the small guy is challenged. Unless they bring some unique technology to the table, they'll have trouble."

Epifanio casts a shadow on the future of competitors within the aviation B2B marketplace. "If this exchange is real, these suppliers don't want to have to maintain a presence and an awareness of multiple sites," he said. After all, Epfanio said, business-to-business ventures are attractive to industry giants because they can find everything they need in one spot.

One such smaller player in the aerospace B2B market is First Aviation , a reseller of gas turbine engines and re-manufacturer of engine components and parts for aircraft.

Aaron Hollander, First Aviation's chairman, said the future holds room for just three or four B2B companies. First Aviation will be among them, he asserted, as it has an established record as a reseller with original equipment manufacturers and the technology that can be integrated using a company's existing computer system.

"We're positive in that the [possible Commerce One deal] will drive the consolidation among people that are trying to build networks," Hollander said in an interview. "We believe there are going be people that are going to survive that are focusing on the end customer, like the military and the airlines. But it's not going to be the pure Internet players."

Shares of First Aviation were untraded at 4 3/4 on Friday.



To: David Alan Cook who wrote (3206)3/26/2000 12:11:00 PM
From: robbie_nw  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3627
 
David -

The 9 million you refer to is the 2.5 million investment...plus the 6.5 million purchase of e-support (which includes touchstone software/unicore biz).

This is already calculated in the estimation of NAV (as indicated below)

From Page 4 of Razo Report:
Public Companies
---------------
EBLD - 100,000 Warrants - Exercise Price for TSSW = $1.00
Price at Report = $4.50 Market Value = $450,000

IPO Candidates:
---------------
Partsbase.com - $650,000 Investment - Cost Basis = $2.50
Estimated IPO $14.00 - Estimated Value - $2,912,000

SupplyAccess.com - $510,000 Investment - Cost Basis = $1.50
Estimated IPO $20.00 - Estimated Value - $5,440,000

Total IPO Candidates = $8,352,000

Estimated Cash And Equivalents = $3,100,000

Summary From Only Ecommerce Investments
---------------------------------------
Est Cash & Equivalents: $3,100,000
Total Public Company: $ 450,000
IPOs - Only 2 - $8,352,000

Total = $11,982,000
Shares Outstanding = 11,340,000
Estimated Net Asset Value Per Share Before Sale = $1.06
Valuation Method for other companies = 5 Times NAV

5 * $1.06 = $5.28

NOW ADD ADDITIONAL CASH ( $6.5 Million ) and $2.5 Million from investment = $9.0 Million
*********************************************************

Total $11,982,000 + $9.0 Million = 20,980,000
$20,980,000 / 11,340,000 = $1.85 per share NAV

You are also overlooking that the 2.5 million investment does not come without a cost....most likely dilution to current shareholders...as they will be receiving additional preferred shares, thereby increasing the total number of shares outstanding.

So if they received 2 million (you can be sure they didnt pay market price)preferred shares for their investment...then the outstanding increases to 13.34 million/divided into 21 million NAV = $1.65 per share NAV.

Either way...current market price is significantly above these #'s.

Lets also not forget that TCG is not anywhere close to being a market leader in the incubator sector. They barely have the funds to even play in this field...and even then only with tiny .com startups (the fact that they invested in a .com that isnt even listed on nasdaq should raise some concerns). TCG has no room for error...and the internet startup game is by its nature a bit of a calculated gambling game. The appetite for IPO's cannot maintain its feverish pace over the long term.....and TCG is dependent on this appetite sustaining. At the end of '99...analysts said (from bloomberg article I believe) that the first warning signs for IPO market will be when you start to see some IPO's start to trade down from their offering price. Whether this analyst was correct or not..only time will tell.

$1.85 per share NAV is VERY generous imo...as this assumes that the IPO holdings do not lose any value over the lockup period. If I were a bettin man knowing what I know about most .com ipo performances in the year following their debut....I wouldn't bet in favor of price appreciation. (which certainly isnt to say that it wont happen...but its more more of a flip of the coin than a bankable expectation imo)

An investor in this field must not ignore ALL of the risks associated with an incubator business model: You are assuming that every investment is a successful one...this is not a practical expectation. Anyone familiar with the venture capital biz can testify that the internet startup landscape is littered with failed companies that were successful in the initial investment round(s)...but failed to ever make it to an IPO, and/or failed to make it as a viable business.

Lotsa landmines out there....just keep your eyes open.