Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (97488)	3/25/2000 11:12:00 PM
From: mike machi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164687

~Vignette is on a pace to reach $1 billion in revenue faster than any other company~ ON24 Video Investor Alert: Vignette Gives Business More Consumer Knowledge Mar 24, 2000 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Greg Peters, President and CEO of Vignette, is giving his customer base more knowledge about their consumers. Vignette is on a pace to reach $1 billion in revenue faster than any other company. For the complete streaming video story users should access on24.com Ticker: (NASDAQ:VIGN) Company: Vignette Corp

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (97488)	3/26/2000 1:57:00 PM
From: Sam Citron	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164687

Why WAP ain't the ultimate answer: Our US wireless system is 18 months behind Europe's and 36 months behind Japan's. Although WAP uses IP technology, you cannot roam the web with it. All you get is a restricted set of proprietary text-based services that have been bundled together by the mobile operator. The main advantage of WAP for the service providor is that it keeps control of who provides which service and has an influence over who gets any revenue. But this closed system is no substitute for the full benefits of the web. Carriers must forget about being gatekeepers for wireless services. The network should be open, because that is the best way to create and enhance the services that give the system its value. [for further info see The Economist, Mar. 11-17 2000, pp. 69-70]