Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Drew Williams who wrote (11223)	3/26/2000 12:24:00 PM
From: Dennis Roth	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29987

Off Thread: Drew, if Ericsson hasn't changed sides why to they now say, "cdma2000 and 3G are synonymous," on their web site ericsson.com They weren't singing that tune earlier. Nokia still makes no mention of cdma2000 on their site. Why is Ericsson promoting cdma2000 1X and cdma2000 3X as 3G uprades in addition to DS-41 if they are still on the other side of the war? If NIH syndrome is so important why is their first CDMA handset being made, as they put it, with "QUALCOMM market proven chipset and software" instead of their own or those of their Nordic brother Nokia? And the specs for their planned cdma2000 subscriber terminal sound like they plan to use the MSM3300. They are no longer at war with Qualcomm, cdmaOne and cdma2000. They work with Qualcomm and want to sell as much cdmaOne and cdma2000 infrastucture and as many of their cdmaOne terminals as possible. Of course they are not going to abandon their lucrative GSM market in their own back yard, nor will they stop promoting GPRS and EDGE for the GSM and TDMA market. But they are no longer sliming cdmaOne or cdma2000. They left Nokia standing alone.