Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (9379)	3/27/2000 11:55:00 AM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

<<Because Iarc has $80 potential. I always think CC are better on more mature companies that will most lickly not run away from you. >> $hit Mike, lets be real honest here. IARC has $80 potential, just for this year....heck, their long term potential is far greater. However, as I explained earlier, I am incorporating a two tier strategy. 1) My long term core holding ( IARC is in there ) and 2) Using stocks as a vehicle to earn monthly income writing CC's. So on one hand I have a bunch of IARC sitting long for the long haul...on the other hand, I have a bunch of shares that are nothing more then a vehicle paying a good premium. Just because it has $80 potential means nothing in this scenario....my goal is the premium, and IARC was paying a 20% premium which is far, far better then most other stuff I looked at. Best, Keith