Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (76365)	3/27/2000 4:14:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I actually said I am human and am not consistent- I already acknowledged that. But I TRY to call my friends on things I perceive as wrong. In my own wimpy hedged fashion.

To: jlallen who wrote (76365)	3/27/2000 4:21:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Supposedly, I am a hypocrite because I act differently towards different people in different circumstances. Of course, the retort is that the people and circumstances are not meaningfully different. I say there is a meaningful difference. For one thing, you and I largely agree, while lorrie and I agree on little but rock and roll. For another, I find the insinuations about Michael so grotesque, they are probably unique on these threads. Anyway, there is the core of the argument, and since opinions differ, there is no way to prove me a hypocrite, which she should realize, being a moral relativist and all. So why did we have the argument?