SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nortel Networks (NT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Curtis E. Bemis who wrote (5193)3/28/2000 9:45:00 AM
From: Bosco  Respond to of 14638
 
Hi all - speaking of CSCO and NT, here is a related piece regarding LMDS, courtesy VARL thread

Message 13295084

best, Bosco



To: Curtis E. Bemis who wrote (5193)3/28/2000 9:52:00 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14638
 
While we are on the subject of OC-192 interfaces, it appears that Juniper is taking market share from Cisco in this sector.

Juniper Networks Enables UUNET OC-192c/STM-64 Production Network
biz.yahoo.com

Juniper Networks Enables Cable & Wireless First Wire-Rate OC-192c/STM-64 Circuit

biz.yahoo.com



To: Curtis E. Bemis who wrote (5193)3/28/2000 9:57:00 AM
From: Alex Chilton  Respond to of 14638
 
Curtis:

I apologize for not being specific. My comments are only relating to router interfaces (which is where we started). DWDM gear is clear. Understood. The press release is announcing a transmission network (DWDM, clear). It was used as evidence to support OC192 interfaces on cisco routers, which, under scrutiny, it does not.

The clear vs. chanelized comment simply stated that either way, its OC192 (or, OC192c), one is just better than the other (again, only as it relates to routers).

Cisco will have OC192 (c or not), unfortunately for their customers, they will be no better than 3rd to market (Juniper just announced today).

I hope this is clear. I thought this was:

Message 13290505

Alex.