To: Les H who wrote (78691 ) 3/28/2000 10:38:00 AM From: Tommaso Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
There are many reasons for this so-called decline in "educational productivity." Notice that it is measured by declining SAT scores. The decline is not so much due to a decline in education as it is to the fact that many more students are taking SATs in hopes of attending college than there were 40 years ago. If you only measured the top percentiles of those taking tests (40 years ago about 10% of the college-age population was in college), the story would be quite different. Sending all these additional students, who are not very industrious or not very bright, on to college certainly does pull down the average level of education. Also, the students are taught by faculty whose careers depend in large part on what students say about them in anonymous evaluations. A faculty member with high standards may be rated well by the best students, but their votes do not count any more than those of students who resent being given low grades. As a result, many faculty teach in such a way as to receive the largest percentage of positive evaluations. They try to make their students feel good about themselves, they give a lot of A's, and they teach material that is easy to understand. This can happen at the best universities. I know of one instance at Stanford University where the professor simply gave everyone in the class an A. The entire football team would take his courses. His career did not suffer. Indeed, he is a very famous person (I won't name him). I see no way out of this situation, especially in state universities. In state systems, the legislature will make noises about improving teaching, the administrations will try to implement it, and the end result is an erosion of standards and the famous "grade inflation." A tenured professor can impose higher standards, but will not receive raises equal to those rated highly in evaluations. There are no measurements of "outcome."