Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : TITANIUM CORPORATION INC.- The Next Major Mining Play -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (242)	3/28/2000 6:00:00 PM
From: Winzer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 343

Sounds like a question for Chevy. Winzer

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (242)	4/6/2000 12:24:00 PM
From: rdww	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 343

Poked around long enough and got this reply to your query about content percentages; rare-earth minerals such as cerium, terbium, dysprosium, neodymium, promethium, holmium, erbium, thulium, and ytterbium have not been tested for since they are not primary focus of exploration. Heavy mineral breakdown % per microprobe analysis from the Heavy Mineral concentrate is: weight percent Rutile 11.0% Leucoxene(+65%TiO2) 7.2% Ilmenite (44-65%TiO2) 22.4% Fe-Oxide 31.1% Zircon 1.1% Garnet 3.9% The above percentages are to be taken as a percentage of the HM content (I assume that this means use only the % of the deposit that is heavy mineral when trying to figger out value. Which means that a HM content of the supposed 1BB tonnes is required. I think that that number is out there somewhere.)