SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (100597)3/28/2000 9:54:00 PM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573102
 
Paul the no fan needed with 1 GHz Coppermine, re <<Large percentage gains are much easier accomplished when a stock starts from a very low number, after being in the toilet for the past 18 years such as AMD.>>

Ah, I see. Very convenient Pauly! First you say that INTC has set record after record over the past month and AMD has not thus implying that INTC has outperformed AMD over the past few months. Then Scumbria shows you a chart and then you end up saying this crap!

For the past 18 months or so, You have rebuffed, taunted and laughed out argument that AMD can move up faster than INTC for this very reason that you just pointed out. And you have the balls to continue to post here. At least your buddy Yousef knows when to hide!

Tell you what, put a heat sink on your brain, maybe it will help.

Mani



To: Paul Engel who wrote (100597)3/28/2000 11:41:00 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573102
 
Large percentage gains are much easier accomplished when a stock starts from a very low number, after being in the toilet for the past 18 years such as AMD.

Paul,

Many thought Intel's stock was in the toilet last year. So then, given your line of reasoning, I can assume Intel's recent rise is not all that significant.

ted