SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jgideon who wrote (2420)3/29/2000 5:47:00 PM
From: Mike M  Respond to of 5582
 
jg, thanks for your well thought out comments. I agree that news releases that do not reflect material developments are short lived. The company will sink or swim on its ability to grow revenue and eventually whether it can get it to the bottom line.

Top line growth has been fairly consistent with GUMM the last couple years but, at least until now the source has been haphazard. I am convinced that the share price went too far on the high side back in January and has retreated too far recently. This is not to say more downside is not possible or even likely in the short run but IMO rational behavior will return once margin selling has climaxed.

The promise of new business looms large with the company and I think it will continue to demand a premium over current earnings once ventures begin to materialize. Working with "mega" companies takes time. While they can be very frustrating they can also be very rewarding and are quickly worth the effort upon coming to fruition.

I agree that short term trends are distracting. I anguish knowing that some folks build positions on margin only to unwind them during declines like this one. Margin is a double edged sword and most folks should only use it for short periods of time if at all, IMHO....

Welcome to the thread.

Mike




To: jgideon who wrote (2420)3/29/2000 7:48:00 PM
From: Hank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5582
 
It is quite interesting that the posts here seem to parallel another company that I once followed- RADA (Radica Games). Radica had begun an amazing turn around in early 1996, going from less than a $1 a share to over $20 a share in about two years. Their claim to fame was new management and a block buster new toy, Bass Fishin. Radica began to make money hand over fist. Unlike GUMM, Radica's rise in stock price was matched with quarter after quarter of increasing earnings. The future looked bright for this company and they were announcing the release of new toys all the time. They had no debt and a boat load of cash. The longs on the RADA thread issued wild eyed projections of anywhere from $40-$60 a share within two years for this stock. Suddenly, short interest began to rise and Radica's stock price began to decline. One market maker in particular, FAHN, ruthlessly shorted this stock in spite of it's seemingly good earnings and future prospects. The longs couldn't understand why anyone would short such a financially sound company that had new products coming to market all the time! Surely, the great success of Bass Fishin' wasn't a stroke of luck and the future release of new toys would pick up the slack once Bass Fishin' sales slacked off. The Street, unfortunately, did not agree. They still saw Radica as a one hit wonder and predicted that earnings would fall off as Bass Fishin' ran it's course. They kept shorting the stock. Soon, the longs on the Radica thread began screaming about short conspiracies and fabricating rumors about possible takeovers by one of the big toy makers like HAS or MAT. Radica management responded with hyped up press releases and a feeble attempt to float the stock price by buying back their own stock. All the while, insiders were selling. The CFO even posted on the Radica thread occasionally. He claimed that the insider selling meant nothing because the sellers merely "needed the money". All the while, the stock price continued to decay. The hard core longs declared that it was a "buying opportunity" and it didn't matter if the price went down because they were "in it for the long haul". However, one by one, the stoic longs that lead the cheers through most of this saga gave up and sold off their long positions as quarter by quarter Radica's earnings slipped, just as the Street had predicted. Today, nobody posts on the Radica thread anymore and the stock sells for around $7.

The moral of this story is that when a stock gets heavily shorted like GUMM and insiders are selling, you better pay attention. Unless you plan on holding this stock for a LOOONNNGGGG time, you are going to find yourself SOL. Radica had it all over GUMM from a fundamental standpoint, yet they still fell like a house of cards and have yet to come back. To believe that GUMM is going anywhere anytime soon is a complete fantasy. Believe me.



To: jgideon who wrote (2420)3/29/2000 11:08:00 PM
From: Mike M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5582
 
Interesting story from Hank. It is doubtful there is any application to GUMM. You probably don't need to hear that from me.

One thing about the insider selling....:

biz.yahoo.com

Incredibly bad timing. Please note the price at which Gary Kehoe sold the shares and when he did it...back in November and early December....before the patent announcement and before the dramatic price rise(sold at $12,$13 and $14)....and in time to pay taxes in 99...Shrewd huh? Maybe his explanation that he exercised when the board told him he could and that he needed to pay the exercise price and taxes is a legitimate one. Brown Russell the Chairman of the Board exercised but did not sell. I haven't quite figured out what Hemelt (the CFO) did...He acquired, disposed and exercised....but no indication of sale...Those are your three key men and Hank would have you believe that the insiders are selling. The insiders selling aside from Gary are ex directors...but it sounds better to say "the insiders are selling"....

GUMM is diligently working to add new products to their stable...dental gum, nicotine products etc...

Also notice that the company has made no effort to publicly defend their stock. They have participated in no web sites....etc.

But if you look hard maybe there is something to Hank's story that has something to do with GUMM. I doubt it but maybe.....