Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Flag Resources (FGR.A A) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: POLARBEAR who wrote (2877)	3/29/2000 3:33:00 PM
From: Just G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4269

Polarbear: I am not the grate one, but damn it, I live for the mining industry, and have done tons of DD on Sudbury. River Valley is a special intrusion, only part of it, and the geology indicates near surface sir, if a deposit exists. It is important to see and understand the difference, and I am trying to get that clear to most on this thread, if Pfn has the numbers the market likes, wake up! It can help Murdo possibly get some backing like in money. Flag's deposit, if any, going by location is a deep occurrence as with most are in the Sudbury area, and that is why I came on the thread to comment, because geology aka rocks don't lie. I don't want to bash this thread, but I am a paid subscriber and proud of mining and can't stand to see false info posted, it is important to understand basic geology. I have stated time and time again, yes his property interests me very much (Murdo's), but it is deep, not surface, which tells me that Murdo still has alot of discovering to do. I hope this makes it clear, as we have Nathanic laughing and doesn't understand this occurrence, so I find it hilarious, as he is not posting the truth sir. Let's wait instead of bashing, until Pfn has the assays out. G