Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Rose who wrote (97720)	3/29/2000 4:40:00 PM
From: mike machi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

~The closing prices of homes for sale this month in P.A. averaged 35% above the asking prices. (I'm serious.)~ Really? Good news for me. Anyone interested in a contemporary 3200 sq ft 4 bd room? Granite, corian, 2 fire places and a 3 car gar? Mike

To: Robert Rose who wrote (97720)	3/29/2000 4:42:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

Hello Robert, We are repeating the same subject over and over... the new economy stocks = new economy players. FA does not apply, nor does buy and hold. Both are old thoughts.

To: Robert Rose who wrote (97720)	3/29/2000 7:39:00 PM
From: Greater Fool	Respond to of 164684

>>The closing prices of homes for sale this month in P.A. averaged 35% above the asking prices Less of a problem than you might think. Consider this: there are perhaps a million houses in Silicon Valley. For every one of those houses to have increased in realized value by $500K would require $500 billion. That's not that much money when you consider that that's just one Silicon Valley company's market cap. Yahoo alone gets you a fifth of the way there. The fact remains that the dirt is still much less expensive than that in Manhattan. Or Tokyo. Or San Francisco, for that matter.