Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Seagate Technology - Fundamentals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Douglas who wrote (1486)	3/29/2000 7:19:00 PM
From: MikeM54321	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1989

Robert- Well if there are enough shareholders who are not, "in on the deal," as apparently SEG officers are, then we can all vote, "No." But one wonders what kind of grease is being laid on the institutional shareholders as we speak. And there is the law regarding fiduciary duties. It can't be blatantantly broken and flaunted. I still find it hard to believe SEG management expects no lawsuits, or an SEC(?) investigation if the real offer is only about $77.50/share. That's a pretty blatant failure of responsibility. -MikeM(From Florida)

To: Robert Douglas who wrote (1486)	3/29/2000 7:24:00 PM
From: KevRupert	Respond to of 1989

Robert, your thoughts are right on the money. I saw Kevin Landis, seg shareholder, on cnbc about 45 minutes ago. He said he was reviewing the offer. A lawsuit against "seg" management is in the future. They are not representing "seg" shareholders. This is a conflict of interest to not receive maximum shareholder value. Management needs to unlock shareholder value, not give it up. A lawsuit based upon "seg" selling total assets at far less than fair market value has legs. Silver lake states its great, for "coms" & "vrts" because it avoids double taxation for shareholders (corporate/shareholder). I'll take my chances with receiving fair value & paying taxes, as opposed to armed robbery. I'm shocked. Sorry for my ranting, but I am speechless.

To: Robert Douglas who wrote (1486)	3/29/2000 8:22:00 PM
From: Starlight	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1989

Could a Class Action suit be called for?