Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bob who wrote (11911)	3/29/2000 9:37:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

I wasn't shouting nonsense at all. IEarnedIt himself admitted that he was wrong: Message 13309185 Guess he was just "connecting the dots". Oops! How is it "shouting nonsense" to point-out that a statement made by a poster is false, particularly when they subsequently admitted that it was false? Sounds more like I was shouting sense.

To: bob who wrote (11911)	3/29/2000 10:38:00 PM
From: ROBERT	Respond to of 18366

hey bob...check this out repost from the RB Thread By: Noboss Reply To: None Wednesday, 29 Mar 2000 at 9:42 PM EST Post # of 261036 EDIG Patents in Sony, IBM, Lucent patents. Just playing on internet and don't know if this means anything - but if you go to this site patents.ibm.com and type in US05870710 (Sony Patent) - it shows Norris (Edig) patent US05491774 as part of Sony patent. Then type in US06044346 (Lucent Patent) - it shows Daberko / Norris (EDIG) patent US05787445 as part of Lucent patent. Then type in US05978810 (IBM Patent) - it shows US05787445 Daberko / Norris (Edig) patent as part of IBM patent. Is this anything? or nothing - sorry if it's nothing - I'm technical illiterate and don't know if this had been explored before. I typed in 5 edig patents from Tinroads posts and worked backwards to see if they were being used in other patents and this is what I found. Don. cheers ROBERT