Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (8158)	3/31/2000 12:36:00 PM
From: Andrew N. Cothran	Respond to of 13582

HEAR! HEAR! and again HEAR! HEAR!

To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (8158)	4/1/2000 10:30:00 AM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13582

Mark this is not the IOMEGA board, and your concern's are valid. However TERO's credibility is close to nill. I, and others here have proven him wrong so many times that its comical. I am no poliyanna and have on numerous occasions gone against the thread and even Gregg when I thought there were negative issues out there. I had a huge debate with Gregg Powers about the handset's Q had made. In retrospect I was right about Qcom's lack of competitiveness in HS. There are other posters here who have showed a distinct Objectivity. Clark Hare after the INFRA deal went bonkers(or was it HS deal). Wmalloy always has a competitive view, as well as others. I guess my point is there are people here who will speak about the possible negatives, Who have credibility and objectivity. Tero is just a waste of space, in my opinion he is a paid shill or is the most single minded person I have ever met.