Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ritch who wrote (21886)	3/31/2000 9:22:00 PM
From: tinkershaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

In fact Q fell to under $400 a few weeks ago. What do you consider a few weeks ago? Since the first of the year, the lowest point for QCOM was on 1/28. on that day it hit an intraday low of 105 Q hit an inter-day low below $100 sometime after Jan 6 (when I bought RMBS) until some date a few weeks ago when I was busy trying to shoot myself because I had no $$ to get Q LEAPS at the time. In fact I did a post on the Fool on the L'union board regarding a discussion when LEAPS might be a good investment. My example was that days Q results if one could have picked up below the interday $100 mark ($400). Although I did later pick up Q LEAPS at around $130. Tinker

To: Ritch who wrote (21886)	3/31/2000 10:46:00 PM
From: chaz	Respond to of 54805

He may have been talking about a trading low, not a closing low. Still, there's a huge difference between a company the size of Q with a highly predictable revenue stream, and one with a royalty stream of what ever size from a few companies. When I read that, I wondered first how many more companies would show up as customers, and if not many, and it took years for actual products to emerge, what would the company do for revenues until products did show up? Q's customers are producing products now! Not later...NOW! Chaz