Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lawdog who wrote (33247)	3/31/2000 4:36:00 PM
From: Eric	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

lawdog Good summation. I agree that Cisco is overpriced by conventional models. It has almost always been! Eric

To: lawdog who wrote (33247)	3/31/2000 4:54:00 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 77400

Well, at least you know why P/E is important to you and have addressed some of the issues Cramer and others bring up in defense of CSCO's valuation, unlike the others. But before you declare CSCO a laggard, consider their growth and market position as well.

To: lawdog who wrote (33247)	4/1/2000 1:59:00 AM
From: Dan Hua	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

That was an extremely well written summation of the over-valuation of Cisco. But you can't forget that many many stocks these days are just as or even more over-valued. Hell, if I were to sell all the stocks I thought were over-valued, I wouldn't be making a dime! You can't use the argument that csco has to sell x amount of dollars in the future to justify it's price. It's more about supply and demand. As long as people keep buying (and they are) csco will always be at a premium. Want to be a millionaire? never sell your csco! dh