SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeev Hed who wrote (9996)4/1/2000 1:08:00 PM
From: Ausdauer  Respond to of 60323
 
My ninth SanDisk-compatible electronics purchase...

...was the 64 MB version of the Lyra. I bought it for my nephew who felt a bit cheated (see the post that follows). The Lyra is my first experience with proprietary CODEC's and copyright protection. It adds complexity to the enjoyment of portable mp3 files and I am ambivalent about its acceptance by the public. More on that later.

The sound quality is phenomenal and on par with the I-Jam and Pontis experiences in high fidelity.

I will post later about the RCA Lyra with more details. I would be happy to hear of other user experiences on this message board.

Aus



To: Zeev Hed who wrote (9996)4/1/2000 1:26:00 PM
From: quidditch  Respond to of 60323
 
Mike, Zeev and Aus: Zeev's post reminds me of another point: has Lexar's preliminary prospectus been distributed? If so and if the u/w have not elected to kill the offering in light of Judge Breyer's decision, I think that there is a strong likelihood that the underwriters will require Lexar to "re-circulate" the red (never a nice happening) to reflect the new material information--again, that is, IF the underwriters do not decide to kill the offering altogether. If they go forward with the offering, re-circulation implies a two-to-three week delay in the original schedule. Some clients' firm orders would undoubtedly be canceled. What is likely going to happen early next week (again, this assumes the red is already distributed): assuming the underwriters decide to swim upstream against the damaging court decision, they will begin informal polling of their largest accounts that have committed to buy--if they get negative feedback, the offering will die and there will be no occasion to re-circulate.

Zeev, the financials included in the red speak as of the date of the audit report included in the prospectus. There would be no need to update the financials unless, because Lexar has to re-circulate and by doing so has to include a later interim period that is reviewed or audited by the independent accountants, a new accountants opinion is included in the filing. In the current filing, Lexar will, imo, be required to update the "Legal Proceedings" disclosure. That would suffice, unless new financials are required as above.

From afar, Lexar's offering is on life support. Depending on the persuasiveness of Lexar and its patent lawyers on the underwriters' willingness to go forward, the underwriters' large institutional clients could nonetheless kill the deal next week by their reaction. They'll probably go out and buy SNDK in droves.

One other question: will the failure to get proceeds of the IPO effectively dig the grave and open the coffin for Lexar's business plan?

Steve