To: Janice Shell  who wrote (165 ) 4/2/2000 8:08:00 AM From: Jacalyn Deaner     Respond to    of 12465  
inter alia, those are answers like your submissions are 'exhibits' ever find out if Vivienne had run the whorehouse you offered in your exhibit? Wonder if they will sue you, Deak-Perera too. You are running off at the mouth again - go for it, however for the record, know now you don't interpret nor speak for me. Never have, never will. ;>) Read now what I asked: Is Leslie Deak the same Leslie Deak of Deak-Perera Capital Markets, in the lawsuit. I gave you the March 1998 Janet Reno letter for you to read and asked you to answer the question since you already admitted you know so much about their businesses. Simple, no? Yes or no would have been sufficient out of a feeble art historian hobbyist, now expert witness. I really don't care if you answered the question or not. It is evident several on the GAAY/QBID/GMKT thread wanted me to think I would end up as Jimmy Hoffa, used the deak-perera names and innuendos on public boards and electronic emails and phne calls and the fact that there is a Leslie Deak associated with the teamsters and Jimmy Hoffa is just another 'coincidence' no? Who said anything about a conspiracy but you, inter alia. The only thing Reno had to do with it is she was involved in the chastisement.  The following is an interpretation by yourself that is more proof you should have stayed out of your present 'hobby'. Jacalyn M. Deaner  By: JaniceShell   Reply To: 2383 by chico8                                     Saturday, 1 Apr 2000 at 11:40 PM EST                                                  Post # of 2384   Jacalyn is, IMO, not playing with a full deck; nor is Gary Dobry.    If you can stomach it, there's more detailed information on the AZNT thread.   Currently she's talking about an Evil Cabal involving Deak-Perera, Jimmy Hoffa,   Janet Reno, and GMKT.