Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zia Sun(zsun) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank_Ching who wrote (7238)	4/3/2000 1:06:00 AM
From: Frank_Ching	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10354

Burns, so it is only you that is freely allowed to bash on a company, deny you are doing it, then admit when you were actually caught, by saying it was only done in jest? Am I right? "Frank, I've asked you before to show where I lied or slandered ZSUN. All you could come up with was a post made in jest."

To: Frank_Ching who wrote (7238)	4/3/2000 2:03:00 AM
From: who cares?	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10354

Burns, didn't you say that you don't bash on this company? "anything they do let out is usually done in a non-standard way to cover up something bad." Please do explain what you meant by that? Frank "chum", please keep up. I think if you had read any of my posts late last week I made it quite clear what I was talking about. I gave several examples(thus backing up what I was saying, something you can't be troubled with doing) that showed where ZSUN loves to mix apples and oranges when putting out numbers in PR's. I'll go over it again since you seem so dimwitted, if it's to their advantage to have a big sales numbers, they'll tout how a "wholly owned subsidiary" did sales of blah blah million in 98, failing to mention that a fat chunk of the sales happened before ZSUN "acquired" the subsidiary. This is at best misleading in my opinion. You could perhaps argue that it's not, if they were consistent, but they are not. First apples, now the oranges. When in fact it is good to have small numbers to compare to(like for year over year growth comparisons) then they will only use the portion of the sales that occurred during the time they owned the subsidiary. Scummy, and misleading in my opinion. Non-consistent, therefor non-standard. Frisky has also pointed out on several occasions that ZSUN is real big on announcing their earnings in ways that are not consistent with the rest of Wall Street or general accounting standards, and that make ZSUN earnings look better to the lay-investor than they really are. Again Frank, pointing out facts like these is not bashing. Double again, if I was invested in this POS, I would be fed up with the promises of AMEX, NAZ listing, multiple PR's for Q4 earnings that are now months late, no refile of the 10SB that is crucial for staying on the OTCBB, much less moving up, all the while wasting company resources suing people that dare speak the truth. The fact that no one expresses these concerns, as they would on any other company, tells me all their are are a bunch of touts humping this stock. You know, Francois over on RB, claims he smells AMEX. I too smell good news right around the corner. CMB