Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (76725)	4/3/2000 12:30:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

<<Thus, social equality is likely to be diluted and merely "virtual".....>> The politics of social status has always been a virtual reality. That is why I am curious as to why you are bending in that direction so early in this discussion. It doesn't seem like you have laid any kind of a maleness foundation yet. Actually the social male is dependent on a context and the primary context is his fit with peer males, females, and children. The role of father is the most distinct identifier in defining the social male in our culture. When other males, females, and children are defined outside of that context, we deny the responsibility of society in the posterity of our species. Who cares who or what is equal to an indistinct male.