Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (76754)	4/3/2000 3:24:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Of course it is defective- women and men are clearly different. Physically and mentally. Just looking at the brain differences you KNOW that the wiring is different- of course it's all a continuum, but I think you really have to be blind to go for androgyny. When they had all that unisex clothing crap that wouldn't fit me because I have a female ASS I knew it was a bunch of crap and I was only a youngster at the time. No matter how much I work out (and I was quite an athlete), or how little I eat- I still retain a very different and non-androgynous shape. It's built in. Like my hormones. And probably my talents, which are verbal. And my limitations (upper body strength is limited). etc.

To: one_less who wrote (76754)	4/3/2000 3:30:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Well, I do not have an androgynous marriage, to be sure, nor does a certain degree of role reversal mean that one ceases to relate, on a deeper level, as man and woman. I agree that there is a complementarity that need not imply subordination, but that one brings something different to the situation. I suppose the metaphor you may be looking for is of a polyphonic duet, where the different instrumentation enriches, the melodies intertwine, and the theme is passed back and forth...........