SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Voltaire who wrote (10651)4/3/2000 4:44:00 PM
From: im a survivor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35685
 
<<DON'T GIVE THEM YOUR STOCK OR MONEY, no need to.

V

>>

Well, you've gotten my attention at least.

I assume you are talking about writing calls. I thought about that, But dammit Tom, I hate writing the calls now when the premiums are so depressed. Would you write Aprils, may's.....atms, otm's or itm's....I am curious as to your strategy as I may have the margin police to worry about myself, but I do feel we have upside on the way and thought it was best not to cover at the bottom, just before a big upswing. ?????

Keith



To: Voltaire who wrote (10651)4/3/2000 4:58:00 PM
From: imaluckylady  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35685
 
Hi my favorite Voltaire,
Thank you. I'll be fine. I believe in those angels.
Ima



To: Voltaire who wrote (10651)4/3/2000 5:18:00 PM
From: marginmike  Respond to of 35685
 
Tom my theory all along has been that Qcoms correction led the overall correction just like its up move led the NAZ up move. If you look at NAZ chart it is similear to Qcoms when it corrected. When Q corrected it did so to its base of breakout around 105. That point on Naz is 3800-4000. I think thats where we go.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News