SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (101736)4/3/2000 6:31:00 PM
From: that_crazy_doug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586101
 
Elmer << Many people here scoffed at the claim and the poster said it was visible from the lobby and anyone could see it for themselves. I went to the fab and I saw the poster and it said 1 Million CuMines in 1 week from Fab12, not from all fabs combined. >>

I'm not going to guess how many coppermine's intel made this past quarter, like you said intel will likely quote some numbers and we'll know then. However, I think the assertion that intel has a sea of parts ready to flood the market and destroy athlon penetration has thusfar shown to be widely inaccurate. Maybe they made 20 million or 50 million, or 100 million, but it sure doesn't look like there are that many out there, and it seems quite clear they aren't getting anywhere near the binsplits that amd is right now.



To: Elmer who wrote (101736)4/3/2000 6:55:00 PM
From: ptanner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586101
 
Elmer <BTW, Intel shipped 32.5 Million processors last quarter IINM, of which 30 Million were probably other than CuMines.>

Do you have/recall a source for the 32.5M number? I have 31.8M in my notes but didn't list a source, likely the Intel quarterly earnings conference call.

What is "IINM"?

Thanks,

PT