Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fuzzymath who wrote (29963)	4/3/2000 8:13:00 PM
From: SteveC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 64865

"It's difficult for me to see what the law is in this case, and arbitrary application of any law to a very few people/entities is the exact opposite of justice." The conclusions of law are on line (go the NY Times web site). If you and Hoyasaxa would read the opinion we might have a more sophisticated discussion.

To: fuzzymath who wrote (29963)	4/3/2000 8:16:00 PM
From: JC Jaros	Respond to of 64865

Kevin- reading your subsequent posts, it really appears you have many fewer questions than you do opinions on all of this. There is a clear pattern of behavior of this monop;oly, spelled out by the DoJ, found fact by a Reagan appointed Federal Judge, and now entered. There is a whole World Wide Web of resource on the law, and a public record of the precedings with regard to US (and 19 states) -v- M$, and lots of stuff pre-dating that. Why it's hard for you to find, I don't know. If you're sincere about wanting to understand what's gone on here, I'd suggest the US DoJ website would be the best place to start. -JCJ