Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Epinephrine who wrote (101808)	4/3/2000 10:55:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573458

Re: "I hope that Crazyoldman does take pictures of his Athlons and posts them on Geocities or some other anonymous web host. And I hope that when/if he does you have the grace to admit that it just might be possible that AMD did have Athlons much earlier than you previously thought" EPI, if I am wrong it won't be the first time. I am basing my position on my knowledge of semiconductor manufacturing. I do not have access to the package or any inside information but I am basing my position on the reasonableness of the claim, not on the alleged datecode which is not in evidence here. If the datecode truly says ww09 of '99 then that needs to be addressed as I don't think a marking error by AMD is likely. Let me ask you this, in the absence of a verifiable datecode, do you think my position is flawed and if so where? EP