Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (102004)	4/4/2000 4:32:00 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 1573213

Thread - After buying back my April $60 CCs early in the day, I wrote May $70s near the close and picked up another couple of bucks a share which I used to buy another 50 free shares of AMD. This volitility makes for some interesting trading opportunities. EP

To: Elmer who wrote (102004)	4/4/2000 5:45:00 PM
From: crazyoldman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573213

Elmer, I thought you were the expert at everything! You certainly try to appear so when expressing opinions. Re: BTW, I thought you were referring to the date on the device package, not the cooling shroud. That adds complexity. Already trying to weasel out of you position on this matter? Re: Now does anyone have a description of AMD's package codes? aceshardware.com Also, check this out: go.to CrazyMan

To: Elmer who wrote (102004)	4/4/2000 6:07:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Respond to of 1573213

<..you were referring to the date on the device package, not the cooling shroud. > Boy, you even have troubles in identifying processor's parts! What an expert! This is not a "cooling shroud", it is the Slot-A processor cover, where the final manufacturing dates are printed out. I just imagined your fear that the _chip_ manufacturing timestamp, frequently imprinted on the packaged die itself, must be earlier than the cover stamp, if cause and effect is still valid in this world. Much earlier. <That adds complexity.> Certainly it does!