SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Duke of URLĀ© who wrote (41143)4/5/2000 2:16:00 AM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Duke -
The exclusionary practices and other questionable licensing and contract conduct was a big topic of discussion in before the original consent decree. MSFT pretty much abandoned those practices... WCS found some of the language about this in the consent decree. This was not an issue in the current litigation, but was clearly part of the MSFT business approach in the years leading up to the first consent decree.

At the time they were doing it, this was routine practice for lots of companies. MSFT apparently did not consider the fact that they had to act differently than everyone else because of their dominant position. In any event I believe that they did abandon those practices and in general abided by the terms of the consent decree.



To: The Duke of URLĀ© who wrote (41143)4/5/2000 2:21:00 AM
From: William C. Spaulding  Respond to of 74651
 
I was just saying that since the consent decree prohibited exclusionary contracts, Microsoft must've been using them to promote their products BEFORE the consent decree. Otherwise, why forbid something that they weren't doing?